Author Archives: michaelsudduth

Bruce Leininger’s “Definitive Proof” of Reincarnation

In November 2021 the Bigelow Institute for Consciousness Studies awarded Bruce Leininger $20,000 for his essay “Consciousness Survives Physical Death: ‘Definitive Proof’ of Reincarnation.” In his essay, Mr. Leininger presents a chronology of behaviors and claims he attributes to his son James. … Continue reading

Posted in Life after Death | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Bruce Leininger’s “Definitive Proof” of Reincarnation

The James Leininger Case Re-examined (JSE Paper)

The James Leininger Case Re-examined [PDF] Article Abstract In “The James Leininger Case Re-examined” (Journal of Scientific Exploration, Vol. 35, No. 4, 2021), I examine an alleged case of reincarnation previously investigated and analyzed by Jim Tucker, M.D. The case … Continue reading

Posted in Life after Death | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on The James Leininger Case Re-examined (JSE Paper)

Conversation with Steinhart on Life after Death

Philosopher Eric Steinhart at William Paterson University has published widely in the areas of metaphysics and philosophy of religion. Among his fascinating contributions is the attention he’s paid to how our digital technologies have provided new and more naturalistic ways … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Conversation with Steinhart on Life after Death

Correspondence with Bruce Leininger

In my article on the James Leininger case (forthcoming, the Journal of Scientific Exploration), I refer to correspondence I had with Bruce Leininger as part of my investigation into the case. Due to the length of my JSE paper, I … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Correspondence with Bruce Leininger

Crash and Burn: James Leininger Story Debunked

“Debunk (verb): to show that something is less important, less good, or less true than it has been made to appear.” – Cambridge English Dictionary Beginning at age two in the spring of 2000, James Leininger began exhibiting behaviors and … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Crash and Burn: James Leininger Story Debunked

Interview on Arguments for Life after Death

Carlos Alvarado recently published an interview with me in his blog. The focus of the interview was my 2015 book on arguments for life after death – A Philosophical Critique of Arguments for Postmortem Survival (Palgave Macmillan, 2015). With Alvarado’s permission I have reproduced the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Interview on Arguments for Life after Death

You: A Review

  “You’re going to be so sorry when you realize what you made me do . . . the good news is I have no regrets.” – Joe Goldberg I was fortunate to read three great psychological thrillers in 2017. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on You: A Review

Behind Her Eyes: A Review

Sarah Pinborough, Behind Her Eyes (Flatiron Books, 2017). Behind Her Eyes is an extremely well written thriller with character depth and psychological insight. It incorporates a well-crafted narrative with ostensible paranormal phenomena and edge-of-your-seat twists that will leave your head spinning. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Behind Her Eyes: A Review

Gel – New Book Announcement

I’m pleased to announce the completion of my third book, a psychological horror-thriller novel called Gel. As explained last year in Stephen King and the Path of Fiction, I’ve devoted considerable time to fiction since fall 2015. One of the reasons … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Gel – New Book Announcement

Exclusivist Anti-Exclusivist Apologetics

Farhan Qureshi recently posted a video on his YouTube channel in which he discussed my 2011 movement from Christianity to the Indian bhakti tradition of Vaishnavism. Qureshi discusses my  conversion story because he has a broader interest.  He’s interested in … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Exclusivist Anti-Exclusivist Apologetics